My Debate back to People Who Strongly Dislike Roman Reigns.

Hey Scott,

Why don’t people have the same argument for Brock Lesnar? Brock doesn’t lose matches and he damn sure doesn’t lose them clean. He runs through everyone and kicks out of everything just like Roman. The only thing Brock loses to is a shot in the nuts and Triple H but people are fine with that. In 2002, Brock ran through both of The Hardy’s, RVD, Test, Booker T, Flair, Edge, murdered Hogan with a bear hug, beat The Rock clean and was going to go over Stone Cold on free television. My point is the way Brock was being portrayed and even today is way worse than Reigns. Plus on top of that, we know Lesnar is a great worker but since he’s been back all he does is suplex people now while Roman gets killed for allegedly only having 5 moves. I’m no supporter of him. I have my own stance why i dislike him. I just have to call out people and their hypocrisy.

​What people are you calling out exactly? If anything people wanted Roman to win MORE. The problem wasn’t that he never loses, the problem was that he was supposed to be a "top guy in training" and he did jobs for geeks like Sheamus and was booked to sneak out of the Royal Rumble for 20 minutes and have a nap. ​