New WWE Geographic Strategy?
By Scott Keith on January 28, 2015
Scott:
Just wondering if you think Sunday's Rumble crowd is going to force the WWE to re-think where they book major events? I mean, we all know they sure as hell aren't gonna change how they book. But would a final four of Reigns, Show, THEDEMONKANE, and Rusev played better somewhere in fly-over country? Is the company going to try and avoid these kind of reactions by avoiding smark cities?
Been a fan for a while–thanks for all the information and entertainment!
Ryan
Yeah, but how many excuses can they make for this stuff before they run out of cities? We've now heard "It's not us, it's Philly" and "It's not us, it's Pittsburgh" and "It's not us, it's Toronto" and "It's not us, it's New York" and "It's not us, it's Chicago". How many places can they burn through before they find the idealized smark-free city that will happily accept the Roman Empire as their conqueror? Plus, as noted, that Rumble was basically booked to get the worst reactions in every conceivable way, so it's not like putting it in, say, St. Louis was going to save it. It just happened that the Philly crowd was much less shy about expressing their frustrations with the product.
Comments are disable in preview.