The Postgame: 9-9-13
By Scott Keith on September 10, 2013
YES! ….and No.
“Here’s the thing they don’t understand: there is satisfaction in the struggle,” Daniel Bryan said in the opening segment, hosted by a SyFy show-promoting Edge. “Because I know no matter how many times Randy Orton attacks me from behind, no matter how many times The Shield triple powerbombs me, no matter how many knockout punches I eat from giants, and no matter how many times Triple H tries to hold me down, I will beat Randy Orton, I will regain the title, and I will be the WWE champion! YES!”
It was another excellent promo in a summer full of them from Bryan, and elegance of the “satisfaction in the struggle” line in particular crystallized not only his motivation, but why it’s OK that this isn’t quite like Austin v. McMahon:
Because Daniel Bryan isn’t Stone Cold. And Triple H isn’t Vince McMahon. Austin and Vince were cartoon characters. Yes, Austin was portrayed as the “everyman,” and Vince was playing off his real-life owner status. But Austin wasn’t an everyman. He was John McClane or Jack Bauer with a Texas twang. And while Vince was playing the role of himself, it was obviously a highly caricatured version of it. As I’ve said before, Bryan and Triple H are playing believable versions of themselves that exist on that thin line that separates real from “real.”
So it worked for Bryan to get beaten down on seven straight shows. Look at your own reaction, you jaded, snarky smark! You were getting legitimately upset that they were ending every show with Bryan getting screwed over and beaten down. When was the last time they’ve been able to establish this level of heel heat with no ironic, detached cheering from the meta section of the fanbase? It’s nuclear. Bryan is, at worst, equally as over as Punk. And you could easily argue it’s much bigger than that, that these are the biggest, purely visceral face reactions since Austin and Rock’s heyday.
But…is a long-term, slow burn to an epic Bryan/HHH match at Wrestlemania XXX going to make for must-see, monthly PPVs? On the show where they did more to establish Orton as a viably dominant heel champion than at any other point in the last month- as opposed to merely Triple H’s avatar- it happened to be the show in which Bryan needed to get a modicum of momentum back. Frankly, it would have been interesting to see Bryan never get the upper hand, and still get screwed at Night of Champions.
Now it seems highly telegraphed that Bryan, with his momentum back heading into the big show, will again get screwed. (With nowhere else to put this, let’s make the perfunctory but necessary note that Bryan/Ambrose was, as you’d expect, very good, probably somewhere in the ***1/4-ish range; however, something was clearly and rightfully left on the table for when they inevitably have a one-on-one PPV match, much like the Punk/Bryan TV affairs of 2012.) And, if this is going to be as slow of a burn, as long of a con, as it looks like…shouldn’t he?
It makes for a terrific long-term storyline if it ends with the heels getting their comeuppance. (Though we’re all aware that for whatever reason- and the reason doesn’t matter, because you’re going to choose whatever reason fits the narrative you want for the polarizing figure that is Paul Levesque- that the heel getting his comeuppance isn’t a guarantee in a Triple H storyline).
But it’s unclear, despite Bryan’s brilliance and Orton turning in the best work of his career, if it’s going to make for must-see pay per view on a monthly basis.
From Killer to Kitsch
Is Depth Overrated?
You’ve Still Got It
Comments are disable in preview.