Question for the BoD
By Scott Keith on September 8, 2012
Here's something I've been wondering about, and feel free to use it discussion:
Have you watched many of the WWE's B-level and C-level shows? They seem to be remarkably inoffensive with little to no cringe-inducing moments. There's a logical and smooth flow to the shows. There also seems to be a specific vision for the shows, and the wrestlers and backstage workers pretty much accomplish it. I'm talking about programs like NXT, Superstars, Saturday Morning Slam, and even some of their YouTube and Classics-exclusive content. Yet, the shows that have the biggest McMahon influence (Vince AND Stephanie, that is…it's weird how Stephanie somehow remains blameless despite being head of creative for 10 years) are disjointed messes. I dislike how WWE's ex-writers will try to blame Vince for squashing every good idea they have, but I almost have to think there's a little bit of merit to that. I look at the B-level and C-level shows, the shows without McMahon fingerprints, and think they're excellent shows for what they set out to do. What are your thoughts? While I still believe Vince knows how to create/develop characters, has he lost his touch when it comes to big angles and A-level shows? Thanks for your time.
Comments are disable in preview.