Could the Invasion really have worked?
By Scott Keith on April 26, 2012
Discussion for the mailbag:
I've seen various ideas on how the Invasion could have been made better. Some are better than others. However, could it have ever really worked as a true "WCW Invasion" in 2001? WCW was a joke of a promotion that nobody cared about or watched by the time it folded. The WWF had many of the greatest wrestlers of all-time in their primes at the time. It is pretty certain that for the Invaders to be taken seriously, they would've had to convincingly destroy/go over the WWF guys for a while before the WWF got their revenge. So, Scott Steiner, Booker T, Buff Bagwell, DDP, etc. were supposed to just roll over Austin, Rock, HHH, Taker, etc. for six months or so? It's not believeable and no one would buy it. They didn't have the option of guys like Sting, Flair, Hart, Goldberg or Hogan at that point, so honestly what could they have done differently to make a full-scale "invasion" better. Plus, Hogan's reaction at WM X8 showed that the crowd thought of most of those established WCW guys as nostalgia acts by that point anyway. I think Vince did the best he could with what he had, it just wasn't much. I personally believe several "Radicalz" like factions showing up over time would've been more effective.
Comments are disable in preview.